Hello,
I was thinking about using this scheme:
| /usr/local/lib/projectname | Program files (i.e. repository) |
| /usr/local/lib/projectname-virtualenv | Virtualenv |
| /var/lib/projectname/media | Media files |
| /var/cache/projectname/static | Static files, collected with collectstatic |
| /var/cache/projectname/cache | File-based cache |
| /var/log/projectname | Log files |
| /etc/projectname | Configuration (mostly settings.py) |
I was wondering whether people could find it counter-intuitive, or whether there could be trouble training new recruits. I understand that some people are using /opt or /srv or /home, and that it may be common practice to put the virtualenv, static, and media files inside the repository working directory.
My backup script automatically excludes /usr and /var/cache from backup, so I can decide what shall be backed up just by placing it in the appropriate directory. This is the main reason I put static files and file-based cache in /var/cache, and why I dislike schemes where program files and data are put in a single directory such as /srv/projectname.
(I'm asking primarily because I'm writing a book on Django deployment and I'm wondering what best practice to propose to the reader.)
Thanks!
-- Antonis Christofides http://djangodeployment.com
No comments:
Post a Comment