> Roberto, I'm actually using uWSGI 0.9.6.5.
>
> Can you tell me what is the issue with the previous version. I can
> stop by on uwsgi IRC if you want to take the conversation off google's
> groups.
>
> -mehdi
Versions < 0.9.8 expect a fully compliant (read: very simple) WSGI behaviour.
Actually the world is a bit more complex than this so in 0.9.8 i added a more "tolerant"
wsgi.input object. (pratically it is the same technic of mod_wsgi for apache with some addition)
Upgrading to 0.9.8.1 can bypass the issue or eventually throw an error pointing to what it is wrong
in django code.
>
> On Jun 26, 9:47 pm, "Roberto De Ioris" <robe...@unbit.it> wrote:
>>> Roberto,
>>
>>> it is uWSGI, but can you explain a bit more what the post-buffering
>>> would help me do?
>>> Would it help me debug with pdb?
>>> -mehdi
>>
>> Before starting a pretty long and boring explanation, can you double check
>> if you are using the 0.9.8.1 version of uWSGI ? It should manage POST data
>> in a safer way avoiding blocking calls.
>>
>> --
>> Roberto De Iorishttp://unbit.it
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
>
--
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment