Re: switched to webfaction, would 600GB be an issue?

Thank you.

On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:15:43 PM UTC-5, ke1g wrote:

The place where I used to work deployed lots of stuff to Webfaction, and we never had trouble with bandwidth.

Webfaction customer support is superb.  I'm sure that they can help you keep tabs on your bandwidth usage as your user base grows.

One tip, if you find yourself getting close. is to make as much of you static stuff (CSS, JS, images) be cacheable, both in the browser and in the web's proxy caches, as possible.  Standard stuff like jQuery can be loaded from mirrors, rather than from your site.  Webfaction then doesn't have to serve as much for you.  But wait to see if it's a problem before fiddling with cache headers, and from where the Django admin loads jQuery.

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, frocco <far...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I swiched from Bluehost to webfaction and am concerned on the bandwidth cap.

Bluehost was unlimited.

It is a small app of about 200 users.

Should I be worried?

The site seems to run faster.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.