Thursday, September 29, 2011

RE: ManyToMany problem

Thanks for the response, that's a completely inaccurate statement.

Here's an example from the Django docs:

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/topics/db/models/#intermediary-manyt
omany

The Group object has through="Membership".

Although, one thing I notice is that it looks like in the Django example
it is only using 1 ManyToMany field (e.g. the Person model does not have a
manytomany field). Is that required? Only one of the related items can
have a ManyToMany declared?

That wouldn't make a lot of sense though, right? I would want to ask for
all Restaurants a Hood as....and vice versa. I'd want all of the Hoods
that belong to a Restaurant.

Thanks.

-Jamie

-----Original Message-----
From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Shawn Milochik
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:07 AM
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: ManyToMany problem

I don't think you can make the 'through' argument a string, and I
don't think there's circular dependency issue with the 'through'
kwarg.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment