producing a GROUP BY clause that includes the data field, which is
very large, and is slowing down the query by over 100-fold.
Here is a simplified version of the model:
class Document(models.Model):
data = models.TextField()
class Attachment(models.Model):
document = models.ForeignKey(Document)
And the query I am running:
Document.objects.annotate(num_attachments=Count('attachment'))
And the SQL output:
SELECT
`document_document`.`id`,
`document_document`.`data`,
COUNT(`document_attachment`.`id`) AS `num_attachments`
FROM `document_document`
LEFT OUTER JOIN `document_attachment`
ON (`document_document`.`id` =
`document_attachment`.`document_id`)
GROUP BY
`document_document`.`id`,
`document_document`.`id`,
`document_document`.`data`
ORDER BY NULL
Doing GROUP BY on the data field is unnecessary and ridiculous. I can
stop this by doing a values query:
Document.objects.values('pk').annotate(num_attachments=Count('attachment'))
But then how do I get a real, annotated Document query as the result?
Note: I cross-posted this to StackOverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7973461/django-aggregation-does-excessive-group-by-clauses
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment