Re: Update of issue (Trac) rejected (SPAM ...)

How to get clear consensus?

Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2018 15:31:24 UTC+1 schrieb Tim Graham:

I marked your comment as "ham" so maybe it'll pass the Bayes filter now. "Easy pickings" is subjective but I wouldn't consider that issue "easy" since there's not a clear consensus about how to proceed.

On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 5:10:06 AM UTC-5, guettli wrote:

I wanted to update this issue https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27936

it was not possible. Trac told me this was Spam with this message:

    SpamBayes determined spam probability of 98.09%

What can I do now?

I wanted to add this text:

{{{

I still think a visual help like the diagram I painted here 21 month ago would be nice.

But maybe I am getting old, wise or just even more lazy.

I think this issue is great for a new comer.

Is "easy picking" applicable for this issue?

}}}

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/16b9a07e-146c-499f-80e1-bc5bdfd45ec3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.