Dear Mike,
Many thanks for your suggestion!
I find it significantly superior to what I had in mind, in the
sense that I would have had to handle the class types manually, with
the obvious drawbacks (error-prone, not so easy to extend), which
your solution completely avoids.
I will thus definitely use it to go ahead because I do think it does
unblock me and, as you concluded, it's definitely enough to get me
started and even going.
In the long run and for my culture, I do reamin interested in feedback,
especially on whether my approach is flawed or is state of the art and
idiomatic in this environment. If it's flawed, I'd be really curious and
grateful to hear about any other possible alternative.
Many thanks again to you Mike and in advance to any other person who
would participate to this discussion.
Best wishes,
Seb.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/ZdsE0Zq_8c4_Cfg4%40om.localdomain.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment