Thursday, September 8, 2011

Re: Streamlining DJango Deployment — Novel idea from the world of CMSs

This is a hard question. It would probably be nice to offer a self contained deployment that nginx/apache could just proxy too, maybe pick that as the default, and then add in writing a fcgi or wsgi file for use with regular hosting.

On Thursday, September 8, 2011 at 7:34 AM, graeme wrote:

He wants to be able to emulate the installation of a typical PHP CMS.
This is often 1) get database username and poassword, 2) copyfiles to
server, 3) navigate to an install URL, 4) fill in db username and
password and other config on a set of forms on web page.

Installing Django and the app you want to use is much more complex and
forbidding requiring use of the command line and editing settings.py.

One question is what server configurations this will support.
mod_wsgi? fastcgi? others? Will this type of user be able to pick the
right choice?

On Sep 8, 12:45 am, Calvin Spealman <ironfro...@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you explain to those of us to whom it is not obvious, what is the
point of this proposal? I don't understand what problem it would
solve.





On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Alec Taylor <alec.tayl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Good morning,

I have just recently starting migrating over from WordPress and Drupal to
the world of DJango.

First of all, let me say that yes, I am aware that DJango is not a CMS!!!

Now, onto my suggestions on how to streamline DJango deployment.
____

= What's wrong with the current method? =

• Doesn't cater to people who don't know Python
• Requires the installer to be a developer (pretty much)
____

I'm building a social-network catering to student-groups, users-groups and
game-clans. I will be releasing this under (probably) the New BSD license.
Because I want as many people as possible to be able to use this project, I
want to make it very easy for non-developers to setup this social-network on
there servers.
____

= What are you suggesting? =

A four-step install process.
• Install pre-packaged Python+DJango-script package
http://i53.tinypic.com/2055fg8.png
http://i55.tinypic.com/e8lgtg.png
http://i55.tinypic.com/o0qiow.png
http://i55.tinypic.com/o0qiow.png
____

What are your thoughts on the DJango deployment redesign?

Would anyone be interested in getting involved (making this happen!)?

Best regards,

Alec Taylor

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-users/-/_b3bjdPN5_AJ.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

--
Read my blog! I depend on your acceptance of my opinion! I am interesting!http://techblog.ironfroggy.com/
Follow me if you're into that sort of thing:http://www.twitter.com/ironfroggy

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment