PS: Why the name Broke?? :O
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:45 PM, DvD <birrafondaio@gmail.com> wrote:
Actually, I already put together some code that works on node.js inspired by Django, have a look https://github.com/brokenseal/brokeMy original intention was to create a framework that would work seamlessly on the server and on the client side but it was just too much for me that I left that project aside to concentrate on the client side only with https://github.com/brokenseal/broke-clientI'm not asking help to start the project, I'm asking for help to make an already existing project a kick ass open source project with a community around it and I think that this is the right place since we all share Django love :)
Il giorno mercoledì 2 maggio 2012 16:11:45 UTC+2, yati sagade ha scritto:I am a Django user, but I don't see anything wrong in a JS framework inspired by Django. Afterall, only great things can inspire. But I fail to understand why JavaScript has to be only client side - It is a perfectly valid choice as a server side language for not all, but certainly some use cases. Besides, the server-side portion and the client-side portions can share code. I recently wrapped up a project that involved using Node.js in the backend, and man how I missed Django there. The current sane choice for a web framework on top of Node is Express.js (Node is itself very low level) - which is inspired by Sinatra, a web development framework(they call it a DSL) for Ruby. My point is when something inspired by a Ruby server-side framework can become the de-facto standard choice for the Node.js community, why not let them taste Django? I personally find the idea compelling, but *only* if the server-side capabilities of the language are respected. If we look solely at the client side, no-one would want to ditch jQuery/Prototype ;)
Now for the motivation, I would always love to hack together a quick app using the same language(and importantly, the same mindset) both on the server and client sides ;) And yes, with the WebWorkers API ported to work with Node.js (never tried) we are going to see some serious advancements.
I understand people's minds have been brutally injured by JavaScript in the past(I'm one of them), but then it *is* a capable language, and it doesn't harm if someone is willing enough to bring reusability and structure to apps written in it by means of a framework.
Cheers!On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, N.Aleksandrenko <aleksandrenko@gmail.com> wrote:Why do you want to port django to javascript, there are great js libs
and frameworks. It will be better to make a js bundle for django
making in ajax ready.
Js Tools working out of the box. Such as:
+ ajax upload
+ ajax registration with error handeling
+ ajax pages
+ binding django and a js framework (as backbone)
+ bind django with ad ui library (as jquery ui)
and much more basic stuff
Building the apps with django is still not DRY. If you are a frontend
developer you can make a bundle to make django better and many people
may find it helpfull and use it.
If you decide to start such project ... call :) me i can i will help
with ideas and code.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Gerald Klein <jk@zognet.com> wrote:
> Maybe I missed an earlier post but I am always looking for new projects
> please explain your requirements.
>
> --jerry
>
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:15 AM, DvD <birrafondaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>> is no one is really interested in helping in this project?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Django users" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-users/-/kQ_GesNzV7wJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Gerald Klein DBA
>
> ContactMe@geraldklein.com
>
> www.geraldklein.com
>
> jk@zognet.com
>
> 708-599-0352
>
>
> Linux registered user #548580
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
--
Yati Sagade
Twitter: @yati_itay
Organizing member of TEDx EasternMetropolitanBypass
http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/4933
https://www.facebook.com/pages/TEDx-EasternMetropolitanBypass/337763226244869
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-users/-/wuaJSGzRuaYJ.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
--
Yati Sagade
Twitter: @yati_itay
Organizing member of TEDx EasternMetropolitanBypass
http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/4933
https://www.facebook.com/pages/TEDx-EasternMetropolitanBypass/337763226244869
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment